• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
LinkedInYouTube
Private Equity Magazin
Advanced search
  • DE
  • EN

Private Equity Magazin

Private Equity Magazin

The magazine for private equity-professionals | Private Funds • M&A • Tax

  • Home
  • Latest news
    • Topic pages
  • Investment Funds
  • M&A
  • Tax
  • Events
  • Background
    • Authors
    • About us
    • MUPET
    • Contact
  • DE
  • Advanced search
  • Monthly UpdatesPodcastLinkedInYouTube

US Tax Withholding Considerations for LP Secondary Transactions

When a non-US person sells an interest in an entity that is treated as a partnership for US tax purposes, such as a private investment fund, the buyer may be required to withhold and remit to the US Internal Revenue Service a portion of the purchase price, unless the buyer receives from either the seller or the partnership a certification that no withholding is required by reason of an exemption. A buyer that fails to withhold may be liable for the underlying tax, and in some cases the partnership may be required to withhold from future distributions to the buyer or be liable for the underlying tax. This article provides an overview of the two applicable withholding regimes in the context of LP secondary transactions.

Investment Funds

by Christopher Bird, Bird Tax Law
17 March 2025
  • investment tax law
  • investment funds
LP Secondary Transactions, ECI, FIRPTA
Source: MUMTAZ/AdobeStock (generated with AI)

Overview of US Taxation of Non-US Persons

To better understand the rationale behind these withholding regimes, it may help to first review how non-US persons are subject to US federal income tax on their US-source income. In general, the US tax treatment depends on whether the income is categorized as capital gains, passive income (e.g., interest, dividends, royalties), or “ECI” (including “FIRPTA” gains).

Capital Gains

Non-US persons generally are not subject to US federal income tax on US-source capital gains attributable to the sale of investment securities, provided that the gains are not FIRPTA gains or otherwise considered ECI, as described below. The receipt by a non-US person of such US-source capital gains income does not trigger a US tax filing obligation.

Passive Income

Non-US persons generally are subject to a gross 30% withholding tax on US-source dividends, certain types of interest, and other “fixed or determinable, annual or periodical” (FDAP) income. This 30% withholding tax does not apply to “portfolio interest,” which generally includes interest on debt instruments in registered form, provided that the non-US lender owns less than 10% of the US borrower. Income tax treaties frequently reduce the withholding rate on dividends to 15% (or less) and eliminate the withholding on non-portfolio interest. The receipt by a non-US person of US-source FDAP income does not trigger a US tax filing obligation, provided that the appropriate taxes are withheld.

ECI and FIRPTA

A non-US person that is engaged (or is deemed to be engaged) in trade or business in the United States will be subject to US federal income tax on any income that is effectively connected with that trade or business, even if the income otherwise would not have been subject to US federal income tax or would have been considered FDAP income. Such taxable income commonly is referred to as effectively connected income, or ECI. The tax is levied on the net ECI at the same graduatedrates that normally apply to US persons: up to 37% for individuals and 21% for corporations. While ECI generally is not subject to withholding, a US partnership that realizes ECI is required to withhold tax against any such ECI that is allocated to its non-US partners, even if not distributed. Importantly, a nonUS person that realizes ECI will be required to file a US federal income tax return annually. For this reason, non-US investors generally want to avoid all ECI.

Read this article in full
Bird Tax Law Newsletter – January 2025 – ECI and FIRPTA Withholding Considerations for LP Secondaries

 

About Bird Tax Law
Chris has been practicing tax law for over 15 years, with much of that time at AM Law 100 firms. His practice encompasses investment funds, M&A and executive compensation. As part of his investment fund practice, Chris advises non-US fund sponsors and investors on the US tax aspects of fund formations and secondary transactions.

Print the article

  • share 
  • share 
  • email 

Also interesting

  • Direct Secondary Investments – Revival in turbulent times
  • German Federal Fiscal Court confirms its case law on…
  • Corporate Tax 2023 – What you should know about German law
  • Corporate Tax 2022 – Current legal situation in Germany

https://www.pe-magazin.com/us-tax-withholding-considerations-for-lp-secondary-transactions/

Top
Private Equity Magazin
  • Contact
  • Imprint
  • Data Protection Policy
  • Cookie Settings
Follow us on LinkedInFollow us on YouTube

The experts of Private Equity